Change is coming to Berlin: What Col. Douglas Macgregor thinks about Germany’s new foreign policy


Updates / Updates 347 Views comments

Incoming German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has tapped Inexperienced Celebration co-leader Annalena Baerbock as overseas minister.

Baerbock, a 40-year-old diplomatic novice, has persistently espoused liberal interventionist views that one left-wing American news website has described as a mixture of “aloof complacency, ignorance and aggressiveness.”

To assist understand the implications of this appointment, I interviewed Douglas Macgregor, a retired U.S. Military colonel and an skilled on U.S.-German relations, about what he thought of the incoming German overseas minister. Macgregor, a fluent German speaker who holds a doctorate from the College of Virginia, was former President Donald Trump’s choice to grow to be U.S. ambassador to Germany. Finally, he served as senior adviser to appearing Secretary of Protection Christopher Miller within the last months of that administration.

James Carden: Does the incoming German Overseas Minister Annalena Baerbock symbolize a sort of break with the extra conventional, more cautious German overseas policy we noticed underneath outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel and her predecessors?

Douglas Macgregor: Very a lot so. I feel at the least insofar because the issues Baerbock has stated, she’s more likely to be a profound break from the past. It could be helpful to go back a bit of bit to speak about Merkel, because Merkel represented a specific amount of continuity. And I might argue that the Germans will not be alone on this. All of the Germanic nations [in Europe] are very comparable in the sense that the populations are conservative. They like continuity, stability and order. Austrians, Germans, Swiss, Dutch, Danes, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, everybody largely falls into the identical class. “What do we would like? Nicely, we would like stability. We would like prosperity. We would like order.” And Merkel, although I didn’t necessarily sign on for all of her considering, represented all that, very similar to her predecessors.

And this has been true in the historical past of the German-speaking peoples and within the Germanic nations for centuries. That is nothing new. So what is new about Baerbock? To begin with, she is unusually younger. She has a special type of background in schooling. She spent a yr as an trade scholar in Florida, much as I spent a yr as an change scholar in Germany. She was born into a Germany that wasn’t quite united yet, but a Germany that was extraordinarily affluent; in 1980, West Germany had a very high lifestyle. So she grows up on this setting with out strife, without wrestle, without conflict, without poverty, without any of the issues that her predecessors knew.

In different words, there’s no history of expertise with the issues that Germany went by way of during and after World Conflict II. And in consequence, she sees the world very in a different way. She is extra American in her outlook, fairly prepared to moralize.

JC: She looks like she would match right in with ‘humanitarian’ struggle hawks like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and, above all, former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to whom Baerbock has compared herself. To me she sounds alarmingly just like the liberal interventionists in the USA who, together with their neoconservative allies, dominate the U.S. overseas coverage establishment.

DM: She’s a crusader of the sort you see in Washington, D.C., all the time. But this can be a massive break from the previous for the German overseas workplace. Even after World Warfare II and into the ’70s and ’80s, we had individuals whose families have been concerned in overseas affairs in Germany as diplomats in the course of the interwar period and even earlier than World Warfare I.

In the previous overseas workplaces of Germany, individuals spent a substantial amount of time making an attempt to know the pursuits that formed conduct in the worldwide setting. In different phrases: What are Russia’s interests? What are the interests in Prague? What are the pursuits in Paris or in London? That’s a very totally different strategy to overseas affairs than we’ve heard from Baerbock.

She appears to haven't any sense of the pursuits that drive issues all over the world in all of those main capitals. No sense of that in any respect. [Her perspective seems to be,] “Our curiosity is in making the world a better place.” [For Baerbock and similar-minded politicians,] all the things is about reshaping the world to evolve to some type of ideologically pure and good and morally upright picture that all the time fails in the long run, frankly.

Baerbock is a crusader in search of a cause to campaign. And that’s an issue.

JC: And it turns into an much more dangerous drawback given the present tensions now involving Russia and Ukraine. What's concerning is that Merkel’s caution might now give method to a sort of Atlanticist recklessness embodied by Baerbock. So I’m wondering, as you're a profession army officer who—in contrast to loads of our army leaders, together with the present Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Employees Gen. Mark A. Milley—has truly been beneath hearth [Macgregor was awarded a Bronze Star with a V device for valor as a tank commander in the first Gulf War], why can we appear so near a struggle between Russia and the West?

DM: Properly, a few fast factors. To start with, Baerbock, together with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the opposite so-called luminaries that we presently have operating the State Department, at the moment are dealing with Sergey Lavrov, the Russian overseas minister. I’ve met him. I had the great fortune to spend virtually an hour with him and listening to him. He’s one of the exceptionally gifted and clever men I’ve ever met. And he is very a lot within the traditional mould of nice European statesmen. This is somebody who understands [Russia’s and other countries’] interests, and he is infinitely more gifted in pursuing those [interests] than anyone… [the U.S. has]. And… [in Russia, President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Lavrov] are at a loss to know… [the U.S.] as a result of we don’t appear to be thinking about our personal interests. We are likely to embrace other… [countries’] pursuits after which pressure them down the throats of the Russians and others. They [Putin and Lavrov] actually don’t understand us.

But what’s worse is that we’re busy pursuing the same type of illusory policies contained in the army that Baerbock and others need to pursue internationally.

And the Russians know this, so they are now telling Washington and Brussels, “Look, we’ve gone about as far as we will go together with you and we’ve made it very clear what we won't tolerate on our borders. We won't tolerate it if Ukraine turns into a platform for the projection of armed hostility towards Russia. And otherwise, we’re not excited about having somebody on our borders who's committed to subverting our government and our social order.”

…[The Russians are] telling us that until… [the U.S. is] prepared to take a seat down and are available to arrangements that acknowledge the bounds of our pursuits and theirs, which primarily means no extra enlargement of NATO, then they will take army motion.

*This article was produced by Globetrotter in partnership with the American Committee for U.S.-Russia Accord.